Research Note
Point Tracking Task Record
Given a video and a query that contains a frame index and two-dimensional location, a point tracker estimates the corresponding two-dimensional point location across fram
In this article
Point Tracking Task Record
Formal task
Given a video and a query that contains a frame index and two-dimensional location, a point tracker estimates the corresponding two-dimensional point location across frames. Modern tracking-any-point systems also estimate whether the queried surface point is visible.
The CoTracker3 paper additionally predicts confidence about whether a track is close to the unknown ground truth under the paper's training definition. Confidence is not ground truth and should be calibrated for the intended workflow.
Terms
| Term | Working definition |
|---|---|
| Query point | A selected image location in a particular frame |
| Trajectory | The estimated location of the same physical surface point through time |
| Visibility | Whether the surface point can be observed in a frame |
| Occlusion | A temporary obstruction between the surface point and camera |
| Out of frame | The point projects outside the captured image |
| Re-entry | The point becomes visible again after occlusion or leaving the frame |
| Sparse tracking | A limited set of chosen points |
| Quasi-dense tracking | A larger grid or collection of points, short of a per-pixel field |
| Online mode | Causal or sliding-window processing intended for sequential input |
| Offline mode | Processing that can use more of the video and may track both temporal directions |
What the output does not contain
A point trajectory does not automatically identify an object, classify a person, assign a persistent object identity, produce a segmentation mask, infer three-dimensional position, estimate camera pose, or predict intent.
Those results may be built from point tracks and other components. The pipeline and its errors must be evaluated as a whole.
Common hard cases
Point trackers can drift on repeated or weak texture, lose a trajectory during fast motion or blur, confuse reflections, mishandle deformation, misclassify visibility, or fail to recover after a long occlusion.
The CoTracker3 project page explicitly shows featureless sky and water as failure cases. That evidence is more useful than a claim that the model can track any visible pixel in every scene.
Metric boundary
TAP-Vid evaluates localization and occlusion with declared query modes and resolution conventions. A metric is interpretable only with the dataset, query sampling, threshold, visibility rule, preprocessing, model mode, and code version used to compute it.
Sources
Follow the evidence.
- youtu.be: BNTcjZ0Ym38youtu.be
- ai.meta.com: sam2ai.meta.com
- proceedings.neurips.cc: 58168e8a92994655d6da3939e7cc0918 Abstract Datasets and Benchmarksproceedings.neurips.cc
- arxiv.org: 2410arxiv.org
- open.spotify.com: 26JgnnwjvK5vYIdRofV8ntopen.spotify.com
- github.com: co trackergithub.com
- cotracker3.github.iocotracker3.github.io
- NIST AI Risk Management Frameworknist.gov
- vggsfm.github.iovggsfm.github.io
- daltonanderson.ghost.io: metas cotracker 3 a leap in ai object trackingdaltonanderson.ghost.io
- arxiv.org: 1803arxiv.org
- ecva.net: 3526 ECCV 2020 paperecva.net
- github.com: tapnetgithub.com
- raw.githubusercontent.com: LICENSEraw.githubusercontent.com
- tapvid.github.iotapvid.github.io
- NIST Privacy Frameworknist.gov
- arxiv.org: 1504arxiv.org
- openaccess.thecvf.com: Karaev CoTracker3 Simpler and Better Point Tracking by Pseudo Labelling Real Videos ICCV 2025 paperopenaccess.thecvf.com